Raj_Kumar
02-19 06:01 PM
Hi All,
My employer has filed for ETA 9089 and it is approved. I am paying for the green card processing. Before applying for I-140 he asked me to sign a memorandum which states that I am bearing the complete expenses of the process (filing fees of I-140 , I-485 and $500 extra) . It also states that I need to be with the company for 6 months from the time green card is approved. In case I leave the company prior to 6 months for whatsoever reason, I need to pay $15000 as damaging charges to company.
He says that signing this memorandum is mandatory otherwise he will not file I-140.
My questions is , Is it legal to bind an employee to these conditions and ask processing fee to file Green card ? Also are these documents valid from legal perspective ?
Please let me know your thoughts on this. Appreciate it.
Thanks,
Raj
My employer has filed for ETA 9089 and it is approved. I am paying for the green card processing. Before applying for I-140 he asked me to sign a memorandum which states that I am bearing the complete expenses of the process (filing fees of I-140 , I-485 and $500 extra) . It also states that I need to be with the company for 6 months from the time green card is approved. In case I leave the company prior to 6 months for whatsoever reason, I need to pay $15000 as damaging charges to company.
He says that signing this memorandum is mandatory otherwise he will not file I-140.
My questions is , Is it legal to bind an employee to these conditions and ask processing fee to file Green card ? Also are these documents valid from legal perspective ?
Please let me know your thoughts on this. Appreciate it.
Thanks,
Raj
wallpaper Mel Gibson 64th Annual Cannes
tbo
04-06 11:34 PM
so old but very funny for some reason
JK747
10-01 11:40 AM
My aunt (father�s sister) is separated (not divorced) from her husband for over 17 years now. She and her 24 year old son (who was 7 years old when his parents separated) live with our family for last 17 years. Her application for visitor visa was rejected in year 2003 when I had invited her to attend my graduation ceremony. At that time I had not sent a sponsor letter. I have invited her to visit me again and this time I am sponsoring for her visit. She owns a house in India and her son owns a business.
Would her marital status (separated but not divorced) create any issues during the interview?
Would her marital status (separated but not divorced) create any issues during the interview?
2011 mel gibson cannes photos. makeup Mel Gibson 64th Annual Cannes mel gibson
indianabacklog
06-19 08:08 PM
do v need to print 325A form on coloured paper ?
This is not necessary. Curious what gave you this impression?
This is not necessary. Curious what gave you this impression?
more...
navin80
06-03 03:03 PM
Hi,
The company I am working for is filing for GC.
They have posted an ad,and all the mandatory work is done.
HR up here have received some resumes for this ad.
After reviewing these resumes, attroney says they may have to place a new ad, as they have recieved a resume which qualifies the position from a local person.
I spoke to my manager and he says the same thing.He told me he did not even interview the local guy who applied.
Is this the only way out of this position. Please advise.
Thanks,
The company I am working for is filing for GC.
They have posted an ad,and all the mandatory work is done.
HR up here have received some resumes for this ad.
After reviewing these resumes, attroney says they may have to place a new ad, as they have recieved a resume which qualifies the position from a local person.
I spoke to my manager and he says the same thing.He told me he did not even interview the local guy who applied.
Is this the only way out of this position. Please advise.
Thanks,
rajunpatil
01-04 12:09 AM
Hi Team,
I am getting ready to invoke AC21, but my passport expires in March 2008.
Will this have any effect on my case.
Any feedback will be helpful..
thanks
I am getting ready to invoke AC21, but my passport expires in March 2008.
Will this have any effect on my case.
Any feedback will be helpful..
thanks
more...
hebron
09-15 12:56 PM
Would the receipt notice of H1-B extension contain the case number that I can use to check the status on USCIS website?
2010 mel gibson cannes photos.
DrW00t
07-16 04:44 AM
HI all, I'm new to this.. i was just wondering is there any web sites where I can find out how to do stuff with swift and some tutorials..?!?!
~Drew
THANKYOU
~Drew
THANKYOU
more...
leo2606
10-05 06:06 PM
There is already another thread opened, please check following link
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14205
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14205
hair dresses Mel Gibson 64th Annual
softcrowd
04-09 10:06 PM
Please reply if you have any info.....
more...
coolfun
01-27 11:10 PM
Hi,
Gurus - I have few questions and I need your help:
1. My EAD/AP expires in June/July '08. Can I apply for their renewal now?
2. Will there be a finger-printing requirement for the renewal? We had finger print in June 2007 when we applied 485/765/131 together?
3. Is it better to efile or paper file?
4. I will be in India from April to June this year. I have an AP valid till end June. Can I file for EAD/AP renewal and leave for India in April. Is there any risk? I can still use my current AP to enter when I come in early June, right?
Thanks so much.
Gurus - I have few questions and I need your help:
1. My EAD/AP expires in June/July '08. Can I apply for their renewal now?
2. Will there be a finger-printing requirement for the renewal? We had finger print in June 2007 when we applied 485/765/131 together?
3. Is it better to efile or paper file?
4. I will be in India from April to June this year. I have an AP valid till end June. Can I file for EAD/AP renewal and leave for India in April. Is there any risk? I can still use my current AP to enter when I come in early June, right?
Thanks so much.
hot Mel Gibson Goes shirtless in
Blog Feeds
05-27 12:40 PM
As everybody knows by now, recently Arizona's Governor signed a law requiring local law enforcement officials to take into custody persons when they have a "reasonable suspicion" that they are present in the U.S. illegally. The person would be turned over to the Immigration Service, and be released from jail if they could demonstrate their legal status. Last Monday, the ACLU and various other groups sued Arizona officials in Federal Court to void the law on a number of grounds including violation of the Constitutional rights of equal protection of the law and free speech. President Obama has questioned the...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/05/liberty-and-justice-for-all.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/05/liberty-and-justice-for-all.html)
more...
house Mel Gibson 64th Annual Cannes
martinvisalaw
05-13 10:08 AM
It shouldn't have any negative effect. It would be better to withdraw the application, rather than just abandon it.
tattoo Mel Gibson Goes shirtless in
happystar
09-09 08:20 PM
how do we know which center it was sent to? NSC? TSC? thanks
more...
pictures wallpaper Mel Gibson amp;
webm
08-14 05:00 PM
Actually your Initial filed Labor Application/approval notice or attorney can help you identify on this piece of Info.
dresses mel gibson cannes photos. house Mel Gibson Actors Mel Gibson jodie foster
yagw
01-24 01:20 PM
Hi- I'm e-filing my I-131 and it is asking where my I-485 is pending? How do I find this information? The cases status online does not give away this information.
Thanks for any help.
Look at first 3 letters of your i-1485 petition. If it is:
EAC - Vermont Service Center
SRC - Texas Service Center
WAC - California Service Center
LIN - Nebraska Service Center
Thanks for any help.
Look at first 3 letters of your i-1485 petition. If it is:
EAC - Vermont Service Center
SRC - Texas Service Center
WAC - California Service Center
LIN - Nebraska Service Center
more...
makeup Mel Gibson Actors Mel Gibson
Macaca
06-19 07:30 AM
House Delays Thorny Energy Issues (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118221331128639861-search.html?KEYWORDS=immigration&COLLECTION=wsjie/6month) By John J. Fialka, The Wall Street Journal, 19 June 2007
WASHINGTON -- Facing a tight deadline imposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee postponed until the fall House debates on several controversial energy issues, including tougher standards for automobile fuel efficiency.
It wasn't immediately clear what impact the House move toward a simplified, less-controversial energy measure will have on the Senate version of the bill. The Senate is scheduled to debate auto-efficiency standards and a mandate for coal-based liquid fuels on the floor this week.
Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), chairman of the House committee, and Rick Boucher (D., Va.) chairman of the subcommittee that is preparing its energy legislation, jointly announced they will focus on less-divisive issues, including energy-efficiency standards for appliances, improvements to the nation's electricity grid and incentives for use of wind power.
"This procedure . . . was discussed with the speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way," the two Democrat leaders said, "so we can rapidly work on a bipartisan bill that can be signed into law."
The turnaround by Rep. Dingell, who has defended Detroit automakers against fuel-saving standards for years, comes as automakers have launched a nationwide lobbying campaign to water down proposed tougher auto-efficiency standards. Rep. Dingell promised to return to the issue in the fall, when the committee is also planning legislation that would regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions that scientists say are accelerating global warming.
While the Senate appears to be pressing ahead, it could face filibuster threats on the auto-efficiency standards and several other items, requiring 60 votes to overcome, a margin that may not be attainable. "One of the questions being discussed is which body goes first with some of these things," a House aide said.
"We have decided to proceed with provisions that represent consensus," Messrs. Dingell and Boucher wrote. The energy subcommittee is scheduled to assemble its new version of the energy bill this week, and the House could debate the completed bill after the July 4 recess. Earlier, Speaker Pelosi (D., Calif.) had asked for an "Energy Independence" bill by July 4.
The House committee also deferred discussion of a low-carbon-fuel standard, similar to California's, which would mandate increasing use of ethanol and other fuels that result in lower CO2 emissions. Another postponed issue is a change in federal law that would block California from establishing its own CO2 emissions standards for vehicles.
The two committee leaders said they were postponing debate because the issues "are complex and difficult."
Democrats are deeply split, with representatives from auto-producing states fighting tougher emissions standards, and the California delegation and liberal factions pushing for them. Coal-state Democrats and environmentally inclined Democrats are on opposite sides over coal-to-liquid fuels, which would emphasize diesel and jet fuels made from coal, a fuel the U.S. has in abundance.
WASHINGTON -- Facing a tight deadline imposed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democratic leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee postponed until the fall House debates on several controversial energy issues, including tougher standards for automobile fuel efficiency.
It wasn't immediately clear what impact the House move toward a simplified, less-controversial energy measure will have on the Senate version of the bill. The Senate is scheduled to debate auto-efficiency standards and a mandate for coal-based liquid fuels on the floor this week.
Rep. John D. Dingell (D., Mich.), chairman of the House committee, and Rick Boucher (D., Va.) chairman of the subcommittee that is preparing its energy legislation, jointly announced they will focus on less-divisive issues, including energy-efficiency standards for appliances, improvements to the nation's electricity grid and incentives for use of wind power.
"This procedure . . . was discussed with the speaker, and she understands the rationale for proceeding this way," the two Democrat leaders said, "so we can rapidly work on a bipartisan bill that can be signed into law."
The turnaround by Rep. Dingell, who has defended Detroit automakers against fuel-saving standards for years, comes as automakers have launched a nationwide lobbying campaign to water down proposed tougher auto-efficiency standards. Rep. Dingell promised to return to the issue in the fall, when the committee is also planning legislation that would regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions that scientists say are accelerating global warming.
While the Senate appears to be pressing ahead, it could face filibuster threats on the auto-efficiency standards and several other items, requiring 60 votes to overcome, a margin that may not be attainable. "One of the questions being discussed is which body goes first with some of these things," a House aide said.
"We have decided to proceed with provisions that represent consensus," Messrs. Dingell and Boucher wrote. The energy subcommittee is scheduled to assemble its new version of the energy bill this week, and the House could debate the completed bill after the July 4 recess. Earlier, Speaker Pelosi (D., Calif.) had asked for an "Energy Independence" bill by July 4.
The House committee also deferred discussion of a low-carbon-fuel standard, similar to California's, which would mandate increasing use of ethanol and other fuels that result in lower CO2 emissions. Another postponed issue is a change in federal law that would block California from establishing its own CO2 emissions standards for vehicles.
The two committee leaders said they were postponing debate because the issues "are complex and difficult."
Democrats are deeply split, with representatives from auto-producing states fighting tougher emissions standards, and the California delegation and liberal factions pushing for them. Coal-state Democrats and environmentally inclined Democrats are on opposite sides over coal-to-liquid fuels, which would emphasize diesel and jet fuels made from coal, a fuel the U.S. has in abundance.
girlfriend Mel Gibson 64th Annual Cannes
sw33t
08-30 02:54 PM
http://www.eetimes.com/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201802703&cid=RSSfeed_eetimes_newsRSS
Digg It at:
-----------
http://digg.com/politics/Why_we_need_legal_immigrants/share
Digg It at:
-----------
http://digg.com/politics/Why_we_need_legal_immigrants/share
hairstyles Mel Gibson 64th Annual Cannes
amindarshana
12-03 08:27 AM
Hi
I have filed 140 /485 concurrent on Aug 3rd and haven't received any receipt. Have opened SR , Sent FAX ..but no updates.
As per the nrew rule implemented on July 16th , All the previously approved labor will expire on Jan 12 2008.
If for any reason we don;t receive receipt , what happens to labor.. Are we back to square one ..
If anybody in simiar situation... Please reply.
I have filed 140 /485 concurrent on Aug 3rd and haven't received any receipt. Have opened SR , Sent FAX ..but no updates.
As per the nrew rule implemented on July 16th , All the previously approved labor will expire on Jan 12 2008.
If for any reason we don;t receive receipt , what happens to labor.. Are we back to square one ..
If anybody in simiar situation... Please reply.
aruna
02-01 03:35 PM
hi,
i have changed my status from F_2to F-1,
yeah you can go to canada, or mexico. even india, i went to india.
All they look for is funding, if your wife has funding from the university in which she got admission that is enough.
i have changed my status from F_2to F-1,
yeah you can go to canada, or mexico. even india, i went to india.
All they look for is funding, if your wife has funding from the university in which she got admission that is enough.
intheyan
08-12 01:57 PM
.............
0 comments:
Post a Comment